AI visibility tracker

Peec AI + Ranqer: broad coverage meets real execution

Peec AI is the mid-market AI visibility platform with the widest entry-tier coverage in the category — 6 AI engines from €90/month. Ranqer is the content engine that moves what Peec measures. Paired, they're the mid-market stack for teams that want broad tracking and founder-level support without enterprise pricing.

What is Peec AI?

Peec AI is an AI search analytics platform trusted by 2,000+ marketing teams. It tracks how your brand appears across 6 AI engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews — on every plan from Starter up. No per-platform add-ons, no tier-gated engines.

Two things separate Peec from the pack at its price tier. First, direct Slack access to the founding team is included by default, which almost no other tracker offers — reviews consistently mention this as a real differentiator versus the auto-response ticketing systems at Profound or Semrush. Second, the sentiment analysis model is tuned for 'visibility dips before they tank traffic,' flagging short-term citation drops that matter operationally even when the weekly average looks fine.

Peec sits between LLM Pulse (cheaper, more API-first) and Profound (pricier, enterprise-tier data depth). It's rated 5.0 on G2. Notable customer: Attio, the CRM. The product stops at diagnosis, which is exactly the gap Ranqer is built to fill.

Who it's for

Mid-market marketing teams and agencies that want broad AI platform coverage plus direct access to the tool's founders. Fits teams with 2-5 tracked brands that need more than Otterly's 15 prompts but don't justify Profound's $399+ tier. Solo operators should still look at Otterly or LLM Pulse Starter (both cheaper). Teams needing Claude, Grok, or app-store tracking should look elsewhere — Peec doesn't cover these yet.

Key features

6 AI engines on every tier

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Mode, and AI Overviews included from Starter up. Matches Ahrefs Brand Radar's platform count at roughly 1/5 the price.

Sentiment + tone analysis

Goes beyond binary mention tracking. Flags whether AI engines describe your brand positively, neutrally, or negatively — and catches short-term dips before they show up in average-based reports.

Competitive citation breakdown

Breaks down competitor mentions by URL, domain, and content type. Shows which specific content pieces win the AI answers — direct targeting input for off-page work.

API + Looker Studio + founder Slack

REST API access on every plan, Looker Studio connector for reporting, and direct Slack channel to the Peec founders. The last one is unique in the category at this price.

Peec AI pricing

Tier
Price
What you get
Starter
€90/mo
Entry plan, 6 AI engines, standard tracking
Pro
€199/mo
Expanded prompts, competitive analysis, historical data
Enterprise
€499/mo
Custom prompt volumes, white-label, priority support

14-day free trial on Starter and Pro. Direct Slack access to founders is included on all tiers, not gated behind Enterprise. Peec is priced slightly above LLM Pulse (€49 Starter / €99 Growth) but includes one more platform on the entry tier and noticeably better hands-on support.

The gap every tracker has

Reviews across G2 and Reddit consistently land on the same line about Peec: 'it stops at diagnosis.' The platform is excellent at surfacing what's happening in AI answers, where competitors appear, and how sentiment is trending. It does not write content, build authority, or place you into the sources AI engines pull from. Reddit is the single largest of those sources, and no amount of diagnostic depth closes that gap.

46.7%

of Perplexity top-10
citations are Reddit

Profound, 680M citations

24%

of all Perplexity
citations are Reddit

Tinuiti Q1 2026

+73%

Reddit citation share
growth Oct 2025 → Jan 2026

Tinuiti Q1 2026

These numbers come from independent research — Profound's own 680-million-citation study and Tinuiti's Q1 2026 AI Citation Trends Report. The takeaway is the same regardless of which tracker you use: AI models lean heavily on Reddit.

How Ranqer fits in

Ranqer is the content engine that feeds what Peec AI measures.

Peec AI is the measurement half of the stack. Ranqer is the execution half. Peec's sentiment analysis and citation breakdowns identify exactly which prompts need intervention and which content types win them (blog vs Reddit vs YouTube). Ranqer handles the Reddit part — finding live threads, drafting contextual comments in a real user voice, posting from vetted human accounts. Comments index within days and show up in Peec's tracking dashboard on the next measurement cycle, typically with visible sentiment lift inside 3-6 weeks.

See what Ranqer would post for you

The Peec AI + Ranqer loop

01
Scan gap prompts in PeecPeec AI

Peec runs your tracked prompts across 6 AI engines and returns mention rate, sentiment, and competitor citation breakdowns per prompt. Short-term dip alerts flag urgent targets.

02
Identify winning content typesPeec AI

Peec's citation breakdown shows which content types (Reddit threads, blog posts, YouTube transcripts) AI engines favour per prompt. This tells Ranqer where to work — most prompts lean Reddit-heavy.

03
Seed Reddit threads with RanqerRanqer

Ranqer finds live Reddit threads for the prompts Peec flagged, drafts contextual replies, and posts from vetted accounts. Threads index within days and enter AI model retrieval pipelines.

04
Watch sentiment shift in PeecBoth

Peec re-measures daily. Gap prompts move from hedged or absent to named with specificity; sentiment trend shows positive movement. The short-term dip alerts now fire the other direction — earlier recovery signals for continued work.

Frequently asked questions

Peec AI vs LLM Pulse — how do I choose?
Both are mid-market AI visibility platforms at similar feature depth. LLM Pulse starts cheaper (€49 vs €90) and leads with a deeper API + MCP integration story, which favours technical teams. Peec starts slightly pricier but includes one more AI engine on the entry tier and is consistently rated higher for hands-on support (direct Slack to founders). If you want self-serve with API integration, pick LLM Pulse. If you want a product team that'll answer questions in real time, pick Peec.
Does Peec replace Profound at a quarter of the price?
Not quite. Peec covers 80-90% of Profound's measurement use case — same 6 platforms, similar sentiment analysis, comparable competitor benchmarking. What Peec doesn't have is Conversation Explorer panel data (real prompt volumes with demographic cuts) or Prompt Volumes dataset. If those specific features matter (B2C brand strategy, enterprise reporting), Profound earns its premium. Otherwise Peec at €199 Pro does what most teams need from a tracker.
Is the founder Slack access a real feature or marketing talk?
Real feature — confirmed across G2 reviews, Reddit threads, and third-party teardowns. Every Peec plan includes direct Slack access to the team that built the product, not tier-gated to Enterprise. The practical impact: feature requests and bugs move faster than at any tracker in the category. If you've worked with Semrush or Ahrefs support ticketing, the difference is immediate.
How does Ranqer show up inside Peec's dashboards?
Peec's competitive citation breakdown surfaces exactly which URLs AI engines pull from on each tracked prompt. Ranqer-seeded Reddit threads appear as new cited URLs within 2-6 weeks of posting. Combine this with Peec's sentiment analysis to measure tone shift — ideally from hedged or neutral before Ranqer to positive and specific after. No formal integration exists yet; workflow is manual cross-reference.
What's Peec missing that I might need?
Three things. No Claude tracking (same as Ahrefs, Semrush, SE Visible — only LLM Pulse Scale and Profound cover it today). No Grok. No app store visibility tracking (LLM Pulse is the only one doing that). For most mid-market brands these aren't dealbreakers, but check them against your ICP before committing.

Related reading

Sources

Explore all Ranqer comparisons